robcycle
09-04-2007, 11:10 AM
So I'm in the process of divorce and one of the several things I've had to separate is my auto insurance. It turns out that this is a good thing, and sometimes, the establishment seems to understand, and maybe even work in our benefit. Or maybe its just a sunny day and I had a good ride to school, but whatever the case ... I was able to insure my car as "secondary transportation". This was the case while I was married, but I somehow suspected that this was because we had one vehicle insured as primary transportation. I had my doubts that they would actually believe that someone could get through life without being totally dependent on a car. I can't seem to find the specifics on their website, but I seem to remember the criterion being that the car was driven to school/work less than three time a week (I could be wrong on that number), and that it was driven less than 4000 miles a year. Well, I use my car for grocery shopping, trips out of town, and carrying lots of stuff, not to drag my ass places I could walk or ride. Anyway, I think it rocks that a large company is ready to give me a break for riding my bike :D
How about yinz, secondary transportation, related experieinces?
-Rob.
How about yinz, secondary transportation, related experieinces?
-Rob.