View Full Version : Gearing equivalents?
haloblack
04-13-2005, 11:45 AM
ANy one have any practiced theories on gearing equivalents? That is to say, if I run a 34x20 on a 26" bike, what woudl I run on my 29"? I currenly am running 32x20 on my Karate Monkey. It seams great, but we have lots of long, steep climbs in so cal and Im wondering if my gearing in a smige to tall. Or Im a smidge to weak...hmmm. :confused:
hophead
04-13-2005, 01:02 PM
I hope I'm figuring this out correctly.
Here it goes:
A 29" wheel has a circumference that is about 9% more than a 26" (depends on tire size too , of course) so you want a gear ratio that is about 9% less than you are currently running. A 34:20 equals a ratio of 1.7:1. Less 9% is 1.55:1 which is about a 32:21(1.52:1) or 34:22(1.55:1).
wooglin
04-13-2005, 01:13 PM
I hope I'm figuring this out correctly.
Here it goes:
A 29" wheel has a circumference that is about 9% more than a 26" (depends on tire size too , of course) so you want a gear ratio that is about 9% less than you are currently running. A 34:20 equals a ratio of 1.7:1. Less 9% is 1.55:1 which is about a 32:21(1.52:1) or 34:22(1.55:1).
Dang. Thats some math. I just add two teeth on the back.
davkatreb
04-13-2005, 03:06 PM
What's that in gear inches?
riderx
04-13-2005, 03:17 PM
Use gear inches and use the same on both bikes. For instance, I run 2:1 on my 26" (34x17) which is 52". When I built the 29", 36x20 worked out to be the same.
riderx
04-13-2005, 03:22 PM
A 29" wheel has a circumference that is about 9% more than a 26" Using diameter I get a 11.5% larger wheel. Diameter is used in gear inches, so I figure this is the way to calculate it. Could be wrong though.
My math:
A 29" wheel is 3" larger than a 26" wheel.
3/26 = ~11.5%
hophead
04-13-2005, 04:16 PM
Using diameter I get a 11.5% larger wheel. Diameter is used in gear inches, so I figure this is the way to calculate it. Could be wrong though.
My math:
A 29" wheel is 3" larger than a 26" wheel.
3/26 = ~11.5%
Oops, your right. I got my numerator and denominator backwards. Your way is easier too.
haloblack
04-13-2005, 08:52 PM
Holy moly I feel dumb. OK, so based on the 11.5% diameter, what are we looking at for the equiv of a 34x20 on a 26" bike?
Im thinking 32x22? Thats seems crazt low though...O I wish I would have gone to school instead of ditching and riding my bike!
lensmire
04-14-2005, 12:15 AM
Go to this site and all the math is done for you.
http://vps.arachnoid.com
lensmire
04-14-2005, 12:17 AM
My bad, at the home page, go to bicycles on drop down menu. http://vps.arachnoid.com/bike/
riderx
04-14-2005, 12:06 PM
Holy moly I feel dumb. OK, so based on the 11.5% diameter, what are we looking at for the equiv of a 34x20 on a 26" bike?
Im thinking 32x22? Thats seems crazt low though...O I wish I would have gone to school instead of ditching and riding my bike!Using Wooglin's way (which seems to be a good rule of thumb) you would want 34x22. Using gear inches that is 44.2 (your 26") vs. 44.8
tryandgetme
04-14-2005, 02:19 PM
I'll probably use the TLAR approach followed by TDFRYBTMAI approach, repeating as neccicary: That Looks About Right, That Dosent Feel Right Yet Better Throw Money At It,